Uz saturu

Premjers: Lēnā vakcinācija pret Covid‑19 Latvijā ir "nepieņemama un nepiedodama"

Pirmajās dienās Latvijā vērojamais lēnais vakcinācijas pret Covid-19 temps ir "nepieņemams un nepiedodams", vēsta aģentūra LETA, atsaucoties uz premjera Krišjāņa Kariņa (JV) šorīt Latvijas Radio pausto.

165 komentāri
  • ...
    08.01.2021 12:22
    Kariņ! Pisies tak nahuj no šejienes ?
  • Komentārs no Facebook
    08.01.2021 11:54
    Nepieņemami ir pārkārp Nuremberga Kodeksu un ignorēt pasaules ārstu alianšu ieteikumus atcelt visus kovidkulta ierobežojumus.

    pārskatei:
    ------------------------------------------

    Ar viltotu testu kā pamatu, nedrīkststēja ārkārtas situāciju izsludināt. Ārsts, kas PCR testu pārdeva Eiropai ir pat savu disertāciju viltojis. Ir par mūsu slimajiem jāgādā ar cieņu un ar godu, nevis jāspīdzina pārējie.

    Maskas - kaitīgas
    Distance - kaitīga
    Lokdauni - galina vairāk nekā glābj
    Izolācija - kaitīgāka pat par pīpēšanu

    Ļauni ļaudis, ļauna diena
    Stūma tautu lejiņā;
    Dieviņš ņēma pie rociņas,
    Veda tautu kalniņā.

    https://dainis.net/latvija/nekada-zina-neieviest-arkartas-situaciju-latvija/

    ------------------------------------------
    450.000 piedalījās Sturgis mocīša rally-ā 10 dienu garumā. Ēda, dzēra, maskas nevilka, pulcējās, un svinēja.

    varēja secināt VARBŪT vienu nāves gadījumu

    https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/09/17/fact-check-sturgis-rallys-covid-19-cases-misstated-online-post/3458606001/

    Tas nozīmē 10.10.2020 visi OK 0% slimo

    Sturgis -- laikam starp 0,02 0,09% inficēti

    un viens varbūt miris.

    VIENS

    no 450.000

    tātad: dziesmu svētki var notikt, ejam strādāt, maskas miskastē, kovidkultistus cietumā un lūdzu PCR tests ir absolūti viltots. Tas kas Eiropai un arī mums to pārdeva, viņš savu disertāciju viltoja un tagad slēpjās no Fuellmich-a advokātu komandas.

    ------------------------------------------

    Ārkārtas situācijas izsludināšana bija jānovērš.
    On the 28 February 1933, President Hindenburg signed the Emergency Decree for the Protection of the German People. This decree suspended the democratic aspects of the Weimar Republic and declared a state of emergency.

    This decree gave the Nazis a legal basis for the persecution and oppression of any opponents, who were be framed as traitors to the republic. People could be imprisoned for any or no reason.

    The decree also removed basic personal freedoms, such as the freedom of speech, the right to own property, and the right to trial before imprisonment.

    Through these aspects the Nazis suppressed any opposition to their power, and were able to start the road from democracy to a dictatorship.

    https://www.theholocaustexplained.org/the-nazi-rise-to-power/how-did-the-nazi-gain-power/emergency-powers/
    ------------------------------------------
    Ārstu un organizāciju saraksts:

    Bartlett,
    Bhakdi,
    Buttar,
    Cheng,
    Kaufman,
    Kettner,
    Mikovits,
    Püschel,
    Raoult,
    Shiva,
    Wittkowski
    Wodarg,
    Zelenko

    https://www.fuellmich.com/dr-reiner-fuellmich/
    https://www.mwgfd.de/
    https://docs4opendebate.be/en/
    https://acu2020.org/
    https://worlddoctorsalliance.com/
    ------------------------------------------
    Budesonide inhalations: Dr. Bartlett

    Dr. Zelenko protokol:
    Hydroxychloroquine 200mg twice a day for 5 days
    Zinc sulfate 220mg once a day for 5 days
    Azithromycin 500mg once a day for 5 day

    Dr. Cheng protokol: IV vitamin C

    Dr. Shiva protokol: vitamins A, D, C + iodine

    Dr. Pierre Kory: Ivermectin
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YgOAaLmoa68

    -------------------------------
    Infection Fatality Ratio
    0-19 years: 0.00003
    20-49 years: 0.0002
    50-69 years: 0.005
    70+ years: 0.054

    https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/planning-scenarios.html
    -------------------------------------

    • In Tunevall’s 1991 study, a general surgical team wore no masks in half of their surgeries for two years. After 1,537 operations performed with masks, the wound infection rate was 4.7%, while after 1,551 operations performed without masks, the wound infection rate was only 3.5%.

    • A review by Skinner and Sutton in 2001 concluded that “The evidence for discontinuing the use of surgical face masks would appear to be stronger than the evidence available to support their continued use.”

    • Lahme et al., in 2001, wrote that “surgical face masks worn by patients during regional anaesthesia, did not reduce the concentration of airborne bacteria over the operation field in our study. Thus they are dispensable.”

    • Figueiredo et al., in 2001, reported that in five years of doing peritoneal dialysis without masks, rates of peritonitis in their unit were no different than rates in hospitals where masks were worn.

    • Bahli did a systematic literature review in 2009 and found that “no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative wound infection was observed between masks groups and groups operated with no masks.”

    • Surgeons at the Karolinska Institute in Sweden, recognizing the lack of evidence supporting the use of masks, ceased requiring them in 2010 for anesthesiologists and other non-scrubbed personnel in the operating room. “Our decision to no longer require routine surgical masks for personnel not scrubbed for surgery is a departure from common practice. But the evidence to support this practice does not exist,” wrote Dr. Eva Sellden.

    • Webster et al., in 2010, reported on obstetric, gynecological, general, orthopaedic, breast and urological surgeries performed on 827 patients. All non-scrubbed staff wore masks in half the surgeries, and none of the non-scrubbed staff wore masks in half the surgeries. Surgical site infections occurred in 11.5% of the Mask group, and in only 9.0% of the No Mask group.

    • Lipp and Edwards reviewed the surgical literature in 2014 and found “no statistically significant difference in infection rates between the masked and unmasked group in any of the trials.” Vincent and Edwards updated this review in 2016 and the conclusion was the same.
    -------------------------------------
    The Nuremberg Code
    The Universal Declaration of Human Rights
    The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
    The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
    The Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine
    Latvijas valsts satversme
  • Komentārs no Facebook
    08.01.2021 11:47
    Lai no sākuma pats vakcinejas! Citādi ko Latvijas iedzīvotāji darīsis ja viņu pazaudēs!? ?
  • Komentārs no Facebook
    08.01.2021 11:43
    Tu jau kariņ ari vecāks vīrs mati balti jau. Tad tev 1jāvakcinējas pencionār hreno.
  • Komentārs no Facebook
    08.01.2021 11:36
    Tu debils??
  • Nu re
    08.01.2021 11:35
    Kariņš apkakājies, pamatīgi apkakājies.
  • mom
    08.01.2021 11:32
    pēc šitā kovid balagāna vispār vairs neļaušu sevi ne ar ko vakcinēt
  • Komentārs no Facebook
    08.01.2021 11:29
    Sāk vakcinēt brīvprātīgos, kur problēma? ?
  • Komentārs no Facebook
    08.01.2021 11:17
    Lai sāk vakcinēt visus, kas grib, nedalot pa grupām.Tad redzēs ,cik reāli to cilvēki vēlas darīt...Neticu, ka būs garas rindas...Varbūt ar to (kas noliktavā) pietiks, lai saprastu, ka vairāk nevajag iepirkt...?
    • Komentārs no Facebook
      08.01.2021 13:37
      Ilze Celma Un cik zināms mums kam radi,draugi mediķi....nemaz tās potes negrib!
    • Komentārs no Facebook
      09.01.2021 02:44
      Ilze Celma "rindas"buus tadas pasas kaa uz testiem, paris cilveki dienaa!
  • Komentārs no Facebook
    08.01.2021 11:11
    Vai tad pirms vakcinas sakuma vispirms nav jauztaisa kkadas analizes,vai cilveka organisms vispar tas vielas panes
Uzgaidiet...
Pievienot komentāru
Neatstāj tukšu
Neatstāj tukšu
Padomā pirms raksti un ievēro lietošanas noteikumus! Atceries, ka jebkāda veida (arī vārdiska) diskriminācija, naida kurināšana, citu personu goda un cieņas aizskaršana, draudi, apmelošana, aizliegtas simbolikas, kā arī pornogrāfiskas vai zaimojošas informācijas izplatīšana ir pretlikumīga. Informācija par šādām darbībām un komentāra autora dati var tikt nodoti tiesībsargājošajām iestādēm.
Uzgaidiet...

Reklāma aizvērsies pēc 0 sekundēm